University of Salford Logo

Welcome to HCPRDU

Assessment Tools

Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Evaluation of New or Reconfigured Services

Exploring Multi Professional Working

HCPRDU Members

HCPRDU Publications

Outcome Measurement

PhD Studies

The Role of Information in Health and Evidence Based Practice

Selected
Publications
of HCPRDU Members

Seminars and Conference Presentations

Supporting R&D Capability Building

Systematic Reviewing

User Perceptions


'To strengthen and cultivate evidence based practice in health care and at the interface of health and social care'
Page updated: 1 May 2003

Homeopathic proving methods

Homoeopathic proving is the process in which new remedies are discovered for use in homoeopathic treatment. Provings involve provers, 'healthy' individuals taking a newly prepared homoeopathic remedy. A prover, under the sway of the remedy, is believed to exhibit symptoms that reflect the properties of the substance. The symptoms experienced by provers are collectively analysed to build the foundations of a new remedy picture.

The process of proving has been credited to the founder of homoeopathy, Samuel Hahnemann. The popular history of Hahnemann's first proving begins with his discovery of the poisoning effects of Cinchona bark. Hahnemann was struck by the similarity between the symptoms of Cinchona poisoning and the symptoms of malaria. He therefore decided to administer a dose of Cinchona Bark upon himself and record the symptoms that ensued. Thus in 1790, Hahnemann had conducted his first experiment, later termed proving.

Since the time of Hahnemann the proving process has evolved and grown into a multi-faceted mode of investigation. Methods of proving are highly personalised and of individual relevance to the homoeopath or experimenter. The most common method is the classical or Hahnemannian proving. Of late an extension from the classical proving has been towards intuitive and scientific models.

This PhD study aims to investigate the development of homoeopathic proving techniques in the light of historical, social and cultural influences. In essence, the aim is to identify the reasons and circumstances prompting contemporary variances in proving procedures. Emphasis is placed upon the rationale underlying individual approaches, whilst also situating beliefs within particular research philosophies.

The research design is essentially qualitative with the emphasis placed upon interpretive sociological enquiry. Data are being drawn from documentary historical accounts to generate a picture of homoeopathic proving from conception to the contemporary situation. Subsequent investigation will entail dialogue with prominent members of the homoeopathic community to examine in detail selected proving models.

Hahnemann S (1810) Organon of medicine, India: B Jain Publishers. 6th ed.


For further details, contact:

Holly Day, PhD Student
Health Care Practice Research and Development Unit (HCPRDU)
University of Salford, Statham Building, Statham Street
Salford M5 4WT

Tel: +44 (0) 161 295 2824 Fax: +44 (0) 161 295 2825
Email: Holly_Day@talk21.com


© HCPRDU, University of Salford, 2003